In-Class Writing 10/01/2019

Conclusion:
Robb Willer tells the audience, “This hate and contempt that flows through all of us every day makes us ugly and it corrupts us, and it threatens the very fabric of our society. We owe it to one another and our country to reach out and try to connect. We can’t afford to hate them any longer, and we can’t afford to let them hate us either. Empathy and respect.” to help show them that all the animosity that is going on is only making things worse not better. He uses the phrase “empathy and respect” throughout the end of his seminar to remind the audience that every human being deserves to be treated equally if we are going to help reconnect as a nation. Willer’s seminar could help conservatives and liberals come back together as a nation to help implement laws that both parties can agree on. This was a very moving TED Talk for me on a personal level due to the fact that my family is very divided when it comes to politics and I can use some of Willer’s points to help my family have more civilized political discussions rather than those discussions ending in yelling and anger.

Conclusion:
this hate and contempt that flows through all of us every day makes us ugly and it corrupts us, and it threatens the very fabric of our society. We owe it to one another and our country to reach out and try to connect. We can’t afford to hate them any longer, and we can’t afford to let them hate us either. Empathy and respect.

Rough Draft #2

Civil Political Conversations

Introduction:

            Social Psychologist, Robb Willer in his TED Talk, “How to have better political conversations” published September 2016 addresses the topic of the political divide in America and argues that it is the worst it has ever been in anyone’s life. He supports this claim by telling the audience how divided our political parties are, then explains conservative and liberal moral values, then discusses a moral study he conducted using various types of essays, and finally discusses a solution on how our country can come back together. Willer’s purpose of this TED Talk is to help others have better conversations when it comes to politics so that we can come back together as a nation. He adopts a serious tone for his audience, the listeners of “How to have better political conversations”, and others interested in the topic of how to understand other political party ideologies and how have reasonable conversations between those with individuals who have differing beliefs than their own. Thesis: Willer uses his credibility as a social psychologist to show the audience conservative and liberal moral values and using movie references to show how both parties think they are the good guys.

Body Paragraph #1

            One of Willer’s main claims is that the United States of America is more divided now than in the past two decades. He supports his claim by referencing his own studies, an appeal to both logos and his own ethos as a social psychologist. In these studies, he continues to show, how and why both conservatives and liberals drift further and further apart. He discovered that over the years conservative and liberals tend to have conversations with only like-minded individuals and those who share the same ideologies as them. When Willer states, “And I think that most alarming of all of it is seeing this rising animosity on both sides,” is effective in showing the audience that this claim can be seen in today’s mainstream media, news outlets, and social media. In news outlets you can see the animosity between both sides, but how it is tearing apart families and relationships. When Willer talks about how in today’s society no one wants to date someone who says the are a different political party,  no one wants their child/children to date someone who doesn’t have the same political view, and people generally find those who have a different political opinion less attractive. This is a very sad statement because no one should be judged on their opinion or political opinion

            Body Paragraph #2

            Willer uses movie references to explain to the audience how divided our country is and who each political party think they are. One example he uses is that we are in a zombie movie and each party thinks they are the “Brad Pitt” in this situation, but both parties are more the zombies instead.

Main Point #1- Studies on Conservatives and Liberals growing further apart

Conservatives- Loyalty, Patriotism, Respect for authority, Moral purity

Liberals- Equality, Fairness, Care, Protection from harm

Essays they read- same sex-marriage & English as first language

Main Point #2- What kind of movie we are in

Zombie

Buddy Cop

Main Point #3- Solution

Moral Reframing

How to get left and right to agree

In-Class Writing 09/24/2019 (Essay 1)

Question 1: Who is the audience?

  • The audience for my analysis is the crowd of adults at the seminar, young adults looking to educate themselves and older adults looking for a way to have better conversations with younger generations

Question 2: How is the audience affected or involved?

  • I think the audience is affected in a positive way because the speaker makes the audience think about how they talk to people and gives them advice on how to better accept others opinion.

Question 3: How will the audience benefit from this topic? What can be done with the information provided? Why is it necessary to know this? What difference might it make?

  • The audience will benefit from this conversation because now they know how to talk to the opposite political party and they can learn to accept the other parties opinions

Question 4: In what context is the reader looking at this material? Are the readers already somewhat interested? Are they completely unaware? Are they antagonistic/hostile toward the topic, or doubtful about any point which might be made? Are they supportive/sympathetic? Are they neutral? How do you know? Why do you suspect this to be the case?

  • As a reader I looked at this TED Talk in a neutral way because I think if someone were to read or listen to this TED Talk in a negative way they would not learn anything.

Question 5: What questions might the audience need to have answered? What questions might the audience be left with after reading/seeing/listening to the argument? What kind of background information might they need before they accept the claim?

  • The audience might wonder what other studies and examples the speaker has done.

Question 6: What is the audience’s background (for example, technical or educational)? In general, are they prepared and able to understand, interpret, and apply the information in the piece?

  • The audience is most likely there to learn, but some may know how to contribute to his seminar and be able to have civil discussions afterwards

Writing 101S- Essay 1

Civil Political Conversations

            Social Psychologist, Robb Willer in his TED Talk, “How to have better political conversations”, published September 2016 addresses the topic of the political divide in America and argues that it is the worst it has ever been in anyone’s life. He supports this claim by telling the audience how divided our political parties are, then explains Conservative and Liberal moral values, then discusses a moral study he conducted using various types of essays, finally discussing a solution on how our country can come back together. Willer’s purpose of this TED Talk is to help others have better conversations when it comes to politics and how we can come back together as a nation. He adopts a serious tone for his audience, the listeners of “How to have better political conversations”, and others interested in the topic of how to accept other political party ideology’s and how have reasonable conversations between those individulas.

            The United States of America is divided politically more in today’s time than in the past two decades. Robb Willer, as a social psychologist, has done studies to show how and why both Conservatives and Liberals drift further and further apart. He discovered that over the years Conservative and Liberals tend to have conversations with only like-minded individuals and those who share the same ideology’s as them. Willer states, “And I think that most alarming of all of it is seeing this rising animosity on both sides” (Willer) can be seen in today’s mainstream media, news outlets, and social media. In news outlets you can see the animosity between both sides, but how it is tearing apart families and relationships.

Works Cited

Willer, Robb. “How to have better political conversations.” TED Talk, September 2016

In-Class Writing- Introduction

Social Psychologist, Robb Willer in his Ted Talk, “How to have better political conversations”, published September 2016 addresses the topic the political divide in America and argues that we need to come back together as a nation in order to fix current issues. He supports this claim by telling us how divided both parties are, explaining how Liberals and Conservatives think mostly, a study he did involving both parties and their views on the essay’s they gave them, and finally telling us how to come together as a nation. Willer’s purpose of this Ted Talk is to explain why we need to stop judging those who have a different political view in order to help America come back together as a nation. He adopts a serious tone for his audience, the readers of “How to have better political conversations”, and others interested in the topic of how to accept other political party ideology’s.

In-Class 9/12/2019

Are all claims supported by evidence, or are they sometimes supported by more claims?

  • Support for Claims:The articles read had claims supported by more claims, but there was little to no evidence to back them up.

Is the evidence used to support the claims from credible sources (relevant, sufficient, typical, accurate)?

  • Credible Evidence: For the most part the evidence that was used in the articles came from individual politicians

Are emotions used to lead us to make judgments or feel a certain way?

  • Emotions: The emotions in these articles are most likely supposed to spark a discussion or debate on the subject. I didn’t really have many emotions to these articles due to the fact that I am not a very political human being.

Does the word choice simply present the facts with neutral language?  Neutral language = Fair

Does the word choice lead you to make judgments about the facts or feel a certain way about them? Leading Language = Biased

  • Word Choice: Biased due to the fact that the article is more focused on the Democratic party rather than a whole in politics.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/centrist-democrats-push-back-against-partys-liberal-surge/2019/03/01/a6674430-3c38-11e9-a2cd-307b06d0257b_story.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/12/moderate-democrats-push-back-against-wild-eyed-leftward-lurch-party/777600002/

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/11/centrist-democrats-take-back-senate-1260460

In-Class 09/05/2019: Social Media

What type of content are your top three posts (or most recent) on your timeline? What kinds of social groups/communities are you a part of? Compare what you see with what your peers see. Are there more similarities or differences? ->My top 3 posts are memes I am tagged in and a profile picture change. My social group/ communities I am a part of are mostly Corgi pages and TV show pages. I am very different from my friends because I post mostly animals.

What is the relationship between what you see in your social media timeline and what you know or believe? ->The relationship between my social media and what I know are pretty similar because I love animals and usually only post about animals

How does your social presence compare with the professional/student biography that you created? ->There is no comparison really. I talk about animals a lot and my bio says I want to become a vet

Where do you find examples of bias in your social media timelines? ->I guess the bias would be animals vs humans. I love animals more than people usually.

Answer: who do I potentially influence on social media? I don’t think I influence anyone. I would like to think I influence people to be better towards animals.

Answer: who do I engage with most on social media? I engage with mostly friends who are out of town or country.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started